Emergence of the Individual

Hollywood actor Ashton Kutcher has over two million followers in Twitter, an online social media network. Before he worked his way up to this number, he challenged CNN, a global and powerful broadcast network, to a public contest -- to get a million followers in Twitter. Kutcher won. An individual winning over an institution. With what he won, Kutcher donated 10,000 mosquito nets to places that are infested with mosquito.

Individuals, not social institutions, are beginning to have more social, political and economic power.

One person who advocated for more community support on an ailment that has never been taken seriously for research and development sent an appeal to an open-ended audience via the world wide web. Millions replied. The government and the private sector moved to provide financial and technical support.

The EDSA II revolution happened so fast mainly because individuals, equipped with cell phones, provided the critical mass to engage the government in a solid fight against corruption.

Each person, through the use of technology, can reach millions in an instant and create a response that is equally instant. Everyone has basically the same access to information and knowledge at a socialized cost, and to opportunities that before were reserved to the privileged few.

This is not a social development where individuals escape from the protection and care of communities, but one where the individuals, liberated by freer access to knowledge, purposely become the powerful and effective instruments of communities for positive change.

David Mercer presented a thesis that the primary social force for change and development will be the individual. Individuals have liberated themselves from strictly social beings who depend so much on social institutions to social beings who are less dependent on others to innovate, discover, advocate and earn.

Mercer believes that over the longer term, full flowering of this individualism will represent nothing less than a quantum leap in social organization and that the “philosophy of individual empowerment is likely to be the greatest force for change in the next millennium.”

There is a negative side to this. One person created and unleashed the “I Love You virus” and infected millions of computers around the world. The business community lost billions of dollars all because one computer programmer failed to pass his thesis defense.

One person in Mindanao has so destabilized peace that the Philippine government spends millions of taxpayers’ money everyday just to fight him and his band of terrorists. The U.S.A. had to invade Afghanistan and Iraq because of one man who, through creative use of technology, eludes the powerful forces of America.

(For comments, write to Nick Fontanilla, abfontanilla@yahoo.com or nick.fontanilla@gmail.com)